Tuesday 1 September 2015

What is gene therapy?

gene therapy

In medicine these days, the word “gene” shows up in all sorts of different contexts and conjugations. There’s genetics, of course, and there’s genomics. Then there’s meta-genomics — and don’t forget genetic engineering, gene-finding, and molecular genotyping! It’s easy to mix up the various distinct branches within the realm of DNA science, but if there’s one subcategory worth keeping straight in your head for the coming years, it’s gene therapy. What is gene therapy? Gene therapy is the use of genetic material as medicine.
To get at just what that means, and why it could be so powerful, we have to start with a quick refresher on how genes actually do things. Genes sit in the cell’s highly protected genome, the library of blueprints that lets every living thing run and rebuild itself properly. To put their code into practice, most genes must be “translated” into a protein — the DNA code specifies the order of amino acids to be added to a chain, which then folds up into a shape determined by that sequence. It’s through this folded three-dimensional structure that the protein performs its function within the cell.
This mice had its genetic deafness partially reversed.
This mice had its genetic deafness partially reversed.
So, if you want to change something happening in a cell, you can achieve this by changing theDNA that codes for the protein shape that does the something. And if there’s a problem of dosage, like having only one copy of a gene instead of two, we could perhaps increase the protein output by inserting a second copy of our own. In either case, we’re changing the genes available to the cell’s regular protein-making machinery, in order to change how the cells behave.
In principle, it’s easy — but is it easy to actually do? Of course not.
First, it’s very difficult to actually get new or edited genes inside the cells they need to correct. Cells have specifically evolved to try to stop that from happening — and indeed, scientists have had to hijack viruses, evolution’s specialized, semi-living DNA syringes, for this purpose. They’re still imperfect, however; every individual cell in your body has its own personal copy of your genome, complete and (mostly) identical to the others; if your problem is genetically inherited, that means every cell in your body also has that same defect, and there’s no way we’ll be able to change every cell in your body. Even if we successfully edit millions of copies of your genome, we’ve still left billions of others untreated.
So, the earliest and still most important applications for gene therapy involve test tubes — remove a sample of a patient’s bone marrow and change a gene of interest, then inject the fixed cells back into the host. This tends to work only if the fixed cells have better fitness or longer lifetimes than the natural type, so they can out-compete the disease cells and dominate the population.
gene therapy 3
It’s only now becoming possible to edit genes within the body of a living patient. In vivo gene therapy is currently best suited to problems that only affect a specific cell type, offering a limited number and physical distribution of targets. The genetic problem we set out to address will still be in the rest of the untreated cells, but if it’s not used by them to function then it’s not a medical issue. Examples of modern target cell types include certain types of liver cells, and the cochlear hair cells of the mammalian ear.
In both cases, repeated virus-treatment can “infect” a high-enough proportion of a specific population of cells with our therapeutic gene to have the effect we’re looking for. Some gene therapy techniques simply insert the medical gene into the host cell’s nucleus where the genome lives, there to sit and make protein alongside the natural blueprints. However, that only works long-term in cells that don’t divide over time, such as neurons. If the cells are dividing, as most cells do, our gene has to be actually spliced into the host cell’s genome or else get left behind every time the cell reproduces.
CRISPR
The primary technology for achieving this sort of splicing is called CRISPR technology; it stands for clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats, not that it matters. What’s important is that by inserting our gene along with the CRISPR system of proteins and RNAs, the gene can be spliced into the genome wherever desired, and the original version spliced out. From that point on, the cells will divide and replicate the inserted gene as though it had been there all along.

It’s important to remember that by fixing a genetic problem, we haven’t changed anything about the heritability of the disease. Fixing someone’s deafness by editing the DNA in their cochlear hair cells, for instance, won’t make them any less likely to pass on the disease to their offspring — though with gene therapy’s available to help address the problem, that might not be the biggest downside in the world.

Saturday 29 August 2015

Videocon launches Z55 Dash smartphone at Rs 6,490; features 5-inch display, 8MP camera

Videocon has introduced a new smartphone in the market dubbed Z55 Dash, which has been made locally under the ‘Make in India’ initiative. The smartphone, which has been designed in India, will be available via Flipkart at a price of Rs 6,490. It will be available in Black/White and White/Chrome colour variants.

In terms of specifications, the device features a 5-inch HD IPS display with Dragontrail X Glass at a 720 x 1280 pixel resolution. It is powered by a 1.4GHz octa-core processor paired 1GB RAM. It includes an internal storage at 8GB and can be further expanded up to 32GB via microSD card.

The Videocon Z55 Dash comes equipped with an 8MP rear camera with LED flash and a 5MP front facing camera. The rear camera lens is said to be made out of Corning Glass with ‘dual anti-reflective coating’. The Android 4.4.2 KitKat-based device includes connectivity options such as Bluetooth 4.0, Wi-Fi, Micro-USB, GPRS/ EDGE, GPS/ A-GPS, and 3G. A 2200mAh battery completes the package.

Jerold Pereira, CEO, Videocon Mobile Phones said, “Videocon Mobiles understands the pulse of new-age consumers hailing from metro as well as Tier 2 and Tier 3 cities. The new Z55 Dash is designed to meet the needs of these dynamic consumers and their changing needs.”

He added, “By manufacturing the handsets locally, Videocon Mobile Phones endeavours to offer affordability and stylishness to Indian consumers.”

The Tesla Model S demolishes Consumer Reports’ rating system

The Tesla Model S is so good it broke Consumer Reports’ ratings barrier. On a scale that is supposed to top out at 100, the Model S P85D garnered a score of 103. Consumer Reports recalculated its score reporting so this Model S wound up with a reported score of 100. The P85D is the all-wheel-version with motors both front and rear.

Consumer Reports says it bases its road-test score on the results of “more than 50 tests and evaluations” on public roads and track testing.


Why is Tesla so good?
Consumer Reports’ auto testers are car fanatics. Some race cars. If ever they were cast in the image of Ralph Nader, that’s in the rear-view mirror. They got off on the “brutally quick” 0-60 mph acceleration time of 3.5 seconds, the quickest of any car ever tested by the magazine. (Tesla claims 3.2 seconds 0-60, 1.4 seconds quicker than the original Model S.) They noted the car produced 691 hp by addin



At the same time, it gets the equivalent of 87 miles per gallon, calculated by comparing the cost of the electricity the car uses to what it would cost to run a similar vehicle on gasoline. Electricity from the wall outlet is 2-3 times as efficient as gasoline on a cost basis.

On the downside, the car weighs almost 5,000 pounds, the range is 200 miles-plus, and you have to plan long trips around the location of 220-volt chargers or preferably Tesla 440-volt DC superchargers (with free electricity). It’s also noisier at speed and less luxurious than other cars in its pricing ballpark — $127,820 in the case of the CR test car. Early on in testing, there was a broken electric door latch to contend with.

Some things Tesla does well may not show on ratings. Tesla is the only automaker with a 17-inch center stack LCD. Rather than dedicate buttons to a garage door opener, they’re virtual buttons on the display that pop up once you’re close to home. Tesla sends updates over the air when they’re needed and they’re not just bug fixes. Some unlock more power and range via new algorithms. No need to trek to the dealership.

Rounding downward to 100
All those good things gave the car a score of 103 out of a supposed-to-be-maximum of 100 points. Consumer Reports says it adjusted its ratings so the scale once again tops out at 100. For the time being, at least, the ratings of other vehicles won’t be adjusted downward to keep the relative scale intact.

Twice before CR has had to adjust its ratings to account for high-scoring vehicles: the Porsche B
oxster several years ago, and the Lexus LS in the early 1990s.


CR’s current best cars: 6 German, 4 American
According to Consumer Reports, these are the highest-scoring cars CR has tested. About half did not get a “recommended” stamp, meaning the models were new and there was insufficient repair data from reader surveys, or because the car scored below average on repairs. Six of the 10 are German, four are American (two Teslas, two Chevrolets), and none are Asian.

Make/Model, Consumer Reports test score

Tesla Model S P85D, 100 points
Tesla Model S (85 kWh), 99 (recommended)
BMW M235i, 98 (photo above)
Mercedes-Benz S550 (AWD), 96
Porsche 911 Carrera S, 95 (recommended)
Mercedes-Benz E250 BlueTec, 93
Chevrolet Corvette Stingray 3LT, 92 (recommended)
Audi A8 L, 91
Chevrolet Impala 2LTZ, 91 (recommended)
Audi A6, (3.0T), 90 (recommended)

Upcoming Apple TV remote will be motion sensitive: Report


Apple, which will host the iPhone launch event on September 9, is also said to introduce a new Apple TV. Along with design changes and internal improvements, a new report states that the device will also include a motion sensitive remote control with multi-axis sensors, a touchpad on the top, physical buttons on the bottom and a microphone for Siri as well.

The redesigned remote control might also be the new competitor in casual gaming. “A game controller with a microphone, physical buttons, a touchpad and motion sensitive controls would be extremely capable. While Apple is likely going to target the broad casual gaming market, I would not be shocked to see innovative gameplay blossom from that type of input possibility, ” stated TechCrunch editor-in-chief Matthew Panzarino.

It should be noted that the Apple TV hasn’t been updated since 2012. He believes that if the company did indeed delay the Apple TV launch which was scheduled for WWDC this year, then it probably had a reason. The new remote is also said to include sensors that track it as it moves in multiple directions, allowing it to detect motion about as well as the Wii Remote, which relies on an IR sensor.

Panzarino added that, “The experience of using it is said to blow away the types of junky smart TV interfaces we’ve had to deal with so far. This is the first real Apple TV product.”

Friday 28 August 2015

Apple to work with U.S. defense department on wearable tech


The U.S. Department of Defense is teaming with Apple, Boeing, Harvard University and other organizations to develop flexible electronics and sensors that could be placed in uniforms or inside ships and aircraft.

Under the plan, a consortium called the Flexible Hybrid Electronic Institute will work on using 3D printing to build bendable, thin electronics that could match the contours of a person's body or a military vehicle, a defense department official told Reuters.

The technology could find its way into soldiers' uniforms as health monitors or placed in the cramped compartments of a ship or aircraft to measure structural integrity, the official said.

But the technology developed by the 162-member consortium could also have civilian uses. For example, the sensors could be used to develop medical devices for the elderly.

Under the plan, which will be managed by the U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory, the U.S. government will contribute $75 million over five years while $90 million will come from companies. Funding for the venture will total more $171 million, with local governments contributing the remaining capital.

Defense Secretary Ash Carter will lay out details of the plan in a speech on Friday at Moffet Airfield near Mountain View, Calif., according to Reuters. In the meantime, more details are also available in a DoD-provided FAQ.

In 2014, NASA, which operates the airfield, said it was leasing it to Google for 60 years. At the time, the search giant said it would use the space to research robots and other emerging technologies. Google's fleet of private jets also operates from the facility.

More recently, Moffet Airfield was the site of a drone conference where Google outlined its plan for drone deliveries and the U.S. Navy showed off a custom drone it 3D-printed on its ships.


Self-healing material could patch up damaged spacecraft in under a second


Space is big and mostly empty, but it’s the small part that isn’t empty that ends up being an issue for space exploration. Even a tiny piece of debris from a derelict satellite or ancient bit of space rock can cause damage to a spacecraft, and that damage can expose your fragile atmosphere-loving body to the harsh vacuum of space in a real hurry. Researchers from the University of Michigan working with NASA have developed a material that might add an extra layer of protection from space debris, a material that can heal itself to seal hull breaches.

The International Space Station is the most heavily shielded craft ever built, a necessary distinction as it’s designed to operate for years in orbit. The current design relies on a series of impact shields known as Whipple bumpers or Whipple shields. These bumpers are essentially thin layers of material that stand off from the hull of the station by at least several centimeters. When a small object impacts the station, the impact with the Whipple bumper slows it down and may even cause it to break up. The result is a lower force spread over a larger surface area of the actual hull.

If the bumpers were to fail, the station would have a weak spot that could lead to a hull rupture. The work by U of M scientists might offer an added layer of protection. This new material is composed of a type of liquid resin called thiol-ene-trialkylborane. It’s sandwiched between two polymer panels to form an airtight seal. The resin remains liquid as long as that seal remains unbroken. Should a projectile pierce the hull of a ship that includes this material, it will no longer be sealed. The resin leaks out through the breach, and that’s when the magic (science) happens.

On one side of the breach is vacuum, but as we’ve all learned from TV and movies, the air inside a spacecraft will be sucked out quickly. The air on the inside of the ship reacts with the resin as it leaks out, causing it to harden into a solid plug that stops more atmosphere from escaping. This happens extremely fast as well — the video above shows the resin hardening in just a few milliseconds.

The plug only has to hold one atmosphere of pressure inside the ship, so it doesn’t have to be as strong as the undamaged hull. It just needs to be good enough to keep everyone alive while they make proper repairs. While space is the main application, the researchers also say it could be useful in automotive and building technology.

New Robotic Exoskeleton Is Controlled by Human Thoughts

One big, robotic foot and then the other; that's how a man wearing a clunky-looking exoskeleton makes his way across the room. The machine's motors are noisy and its movements are painfully slow, but these details seem to fade into the background when you realize how the man is controlling the cumbersome contraption: He's doing it with his mind.
The exoskeleton — a robotic device that fits around the man's hips and legs — is part of a new technology being developed by researchers in Germany and Korea. The other part is a dark cap on the man's head, covered with electrodes that facilitate the connection between his brain and the machine.
The man wearing the exoskeleton in the experiment can walk on his own (he's one of the participants in the researchers' newly published study), but the scientists think their new mind-controlled device could one day be used by people who can't walk — such as those who have suffered severe spinal cord injuries, or people with neurodegenerative diseases, like amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). [Bionic Humans: Top 10 Technologies]
Lots of researchers are working to develop technologies that help people regain control over their movements through a combination of robotics and brainpower (formally known as brain-computer interface control systems).

In 2011, a woman who suffered a stroke that left her unable to move lifted a cup with a robotic arm that she manipulated with her thoughts. In 2012, another woman (this one a quadriplegic suffering from spinocerebellar degeneration) doled out a few high fives and ate a piece of chocolate using a similar, mind-controlled robotic arm.
But these technologies differ from the new brain-controlled exoskeletonin a very important way: In order to manipulate either of these robotic arms with their brains, the patients had to first undergo invasive brain surgery. Surgeons implanted tiny electronics into the patients' brain that, when connected to external wires, allowed the women to control the robotic arms using electrical impulses from their brains.
But the brain-computer interface developed by researchers at Korea University in Seoul, South Korea, and the Technical University (TU) of Berlin doesn't require brain surgery. In order to control the exoskeleton, study subjects first strap on the cap covered in small electrodes that cling to their scalps. The skullcaps are the tools that connect the subject's brain to the exoskeleton, the researchers said, and are commonly used in electroencephalograms (EEGs) — a method of recording electrical activity by placing conductive materials on the scalp (the brain waves are then plotted on a chart, much like heart rate).
In the exoskeleton study, the EEG cap was used to pick up very particular brain signals — those created by what the researchers call steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs). Essentially, the electrodes detect "flashing lights," the researchers said.
A small controller jutting out from the exoskeleton holds a set of light-emitting diodes (LEDs) that light up in different patterns. The patterns represent specific commands that the exoskeleton can carry out, such as stand up, sit down, walk forward, turn left and turn right. [Super-Intelligent Machines: 7 Robotic Futures]
The person wearing the exoskeleton stares at one of these lights (for example, the one that corresponds to the command for taking a step forward). His brain produces a particular electrical signal in response to seeing the light. That signal is picked up by the electrode cap, which sends the brain signal information to a computer via a wireless connection. The computer then translates the brain signals into the appropriate command and sends that command to the exoskeleton. Within a few seconds, the exoskeleton takes a step forward.
The setup is "robust and intuitive," according to Klaus Müller, a professor in the computer science department at TU and lead author of the new paper outlining the research. The technology is considered robust because the interface still works even though the exoskeleton creates all kinds of electrical signals that could interfere with a person's brain signals. And it's intuitive because, despite all the steps involved in the brain-controlled process, it's actually pretty simple to get the exoskeleton to do what you want it to do, Müller told Live Science in an email.
But the brain-computer interface is not without its quirks. For one thing, all 12 participants in the study had to be screened for epilepsy before participating, and even Müller said that staring at the interface's flashing LEDs for extended periods of time gives him a headache.
In the future, the researchers hope to create a similar system that causes less "visual fatigue," Müller said. The other obstacle standing in the exoskeleton's way is cost.
Not only do the researchers need to conduct all kinds of expensive clinical studies before getting these devices anywhere near patients in the real world, the patients themselves will then have to pay for them. Getting insurance companies to cover the cost of this futuristic (but potentially life-altering) tech could be the hardest part of the process, Müller said.